Bear attacks man, politically correct know-nothing’s pile on

Our hero for today is Richard Ahlstrand, of Auburn, MA, who had every right to defend his own life versus a bear by whatever means available. Don’t let the PC folks get you down, sir. You did the right thing. But then you already know that.
The very idea that he did anything remotely wrong in defending his own life is unconscionable.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Rabbi Steven Pruzansky – well said, sir.

While I am clearly not very prolific, a piece I read today by Rabbi Steven Pruzansky, of Teaneck, New Jersey, was so clearly articulated that it jolted me from my blogging torpor and forced me to point my voluminous readership his way.

His piece, The Decline and Fall of the American Empire, which he wrote the day after the election, details simply and elegantly our present situation here in our once-great country.

Thank you, Rabbi.

Posted in Politiconomics | Leave a comment

Today’s Hero: Robert Goodwin

Aaaaaaand we’re back. This story today in the Boston Herald compelled me to actually post this.

Our hero is a Mr. Robert Goodwin of Arlington, who, according to the Herald, refused to go along with the ridiculous Security Theatre currently being randomly performed by the MBTA here in Boston. I personally once saw one of these roaming throw-back “checkpoints,” but was near enough another stop to simply turn around and leave. Alewife Station is the end of the Red Line, with no other stations nearby, giving Mr. Goodwin ample reason to be pissed and little choice. Good on you, sir, for standing up to these embiciles.

The second award today (an unprecedented step in these trying times) goes to Cambridge District Court Judge Roanne Sragow, whose superlative moral compass saw this incident for the incredible nonsensical intrusion into basic freedom it is and dismissed the charges. Golf clap for you, Your Honor. Well done.

Posted in General | 1 Response

Euthanize the US Postal Service

Bloomberg BusinessWeek has an excellent article on the US Postal Service and its many, many, many problems. Falling volumes, rising costs, unions, pensions, healthcare.

Let me propose a solution that isn’t so modest: Dismantle the thing. Shut it down. This bloated, anachronistic, expensive Hydra has lived long enough. Don’t “reinvent” it. Don’t cook up a bunch of half-baked tangential “services” in a pathetic attempt to innovate and “grow revenue.” Don’t waste another microsecond “negotiating” with the unions. Far kinder to euthanize it and let the resources it consumes be redirected into something of value.

Here’s the plan: lay off all the carriers, drivers, sorters, counter clerks. Every employee. Every one. Sell the trucks, jeeps, cars, vans, trailers. Every one. Sell the post office buildings. All of them. Close the adminstrative offices and sell those buildings, too. All of them. Sell the furniture/fixtures/ down to the bare walls. Put the proceeds in a defined contribution system for retired and legacy employees and shove their iceberg into open water. If anything is left over (there won’t be), buy a cup of coffee for the auctioneer.

How many legitimate pieces of first class mail do you get in a year? A dozen? How many will you get next year? Are there any other ways a similar message could be delivered to you? You bet there are.

More than half the mail the USPS delivers is junk mail. This means the direct marketing association people will be unhappy. Boo hoo. How many trees do you idiots kill, ship to me, and make me carry up and then down stairs and put in my recycling bin? Why does the USPS charge them a third of the price of first class mail? That is the most ass-backwards thing I have ever heard. Look – I’m saving Planet Earth right out of the gate here. I’m nothing if not Green.

What else do I get in the mail? Magazines? Print magazines are dying. Yes, I prefer a print magazine, but if I can read it on an iPad or online in its full form, I think I can make that sacrifice. Or, you could work out dead-tree subscription delivery some other way – through the few remaining newsstands, for example: print a coupon or show some proof of subscription to the newsseller, they get credit from the publisher. Easily handled with technology for you Luddites. In any event it will be a moot point in five years or less anyway.

Who else is gonna cry wolf? Well, the nearly 600,000 Hydra employees who will be laid off. Their unions. Again, Boo Hoo. If you open up the shrinking market for first class mail delivery to FedEx, UPS, and other potential competitors, guess what? They’re gonna need Cliff Clavins to schlep all that stuff around. No, they won’t need 600,000 of them. No, it won’t be for forty-four cents anymore. But would you pay a buck to send Aunt Muriel that birthday card since she doesn’t have Gmail? Yes. Yes you would.

In the end, I think the happy folks will far outnumber the not-so-happy-you-took-my-job-for-life folks. You know who else is gonna be happy? Starbucks. This little plan will open up nearly 32,000 former Post Offices it can then fill with hipster music and comfy chairs and free wi-fi and bags of Cafe Verona so you can get that $5 latte in West Branch, Iowa and anywhere else you might accidentally find yourself undercaffeinated.

The US Postal Service, like so many other things our government undertook in the last couple centuries, is no longer a necessary service. Private companies and alternate technologies can provide the “services” the USPS currently provides, faster, cheaper, better, and in the way you want them. This is America. We deserve better.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Cash for clunkers, the sequel

The Wall Street Journal highlighted yesterday that the used car market is incredibly tight right now and prices are unusually high – making this an excellent time to sell your used car (or trade it in on a new car, which is, of course, what our government would consider the patriotic thing to do.) Gee, I wonder why this might be?
The economy’s not exactly booming along. People aren’t spending a ton of money (since they don’t have any), and gas is over $4 in most of the country.
Why, oh why, would there be a shortage of “pre-owned” automobiles?

Oh wait. Could it be because the wizards in charge DESTROYED over 600,000 of them last year in the Cash For Clunkers Scheme?

Naw. That can’t be it. Because that would mean taxpayers paid for the first scandalous waste of money to destroy things which still had value, and now are paying higher prices for the remaining vehicles.
In essence, the taxpayers are paying twice – once for the clunker, and again in the form of higher prices for used cars now. (Plus of course the deadweight loss of value inherent in the government administration of this idiotic fraud.)
Golf clap for our government. Brilliant. Well done.

Posted in Politiconomics | Leave a comment

Oh Boy, The Kentucky Derby

Just an excuse to desecrate some perfectly good bourbon with a bunch of greenery and sugar.

Fair disclosure, I know very little about horse racing, but there are many sports I don’t care about, and that’s never stopped me from mocking them.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Best political advertisement ever

Krugmaniswrong.com brought this to my attention, the Best Political Ad Ever. Enjoy.

Posted in Politiconomics | Leave a comment

Today’s Hero: Martin Broughton

We give this prestigious award to Martin Broughton, the chairman of British Airways, for the all-too-rare ability to cut through the politically correct fog and exhibit some intellectual honesty in his statements regarding airport “security.” And in public, no less. Kudos to you, Mr. Broughton.

Posted in Politiconomics | Leave a comment

MA beats four states in recent poll

According to a recent poll of 600 CEO’s by Chief Executive magazine, Massachusetts ranks 47th of the 50 states.
Of course the four we beat are all bankrupt, too, but MA trails even that bastion of malfeasance and graft, Illinois, which I personally find perhaps even more embarassing.
[Sigh.] I guess it’s not that surprising considering the gaggle of never-had-a-real-job buffoons we have runnin’ the joint, and the utterly-clueless voters who keep them there.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

unpaid internships are a bad idea

The recent New York Times article on unpaid internships highlights all the potential problems with companies “hiring” unpaid interns, including the problem all the politards in Washington and elsewhere have with the practice. While I agree that unpaid internships are a bad idea, my reasons have nothing to do with all the hibberty-jibberty nonsense (pdf) a bunch of folks who’ve never had real jobs spew out:

1) If your company offers unpaid internships, you are severely restricting your potential candidate pool. Not many, particularly now, can AFFORD to work with no pay, no matter how “valuable” the “experience” might be. I know I certainly couldn’t when I was a student. Do you really want to limit your company to only candidates that don’t actually need the job?

2) The candidate pool is unnecessarily limited in a second way: I value my time and my life too highly to work for nothing, on the basis of some stranger’s “promise” that my “experience” will be “valuable” and that therefore I should enter into some arrangement whereby my time and effort is valued at zero. I fervently hope today’s youth have at least some marginal level of self-respect and believe similarly. Do you really want to exclude candidates with a healthy level of self-respect?

Let’s be honest here. If your company has a legitimate need for junior-level employees, you can afford to pay them something, even if it’s only minimum wage or a flat stipend for the summer. If your company is doing it out of some sense of “public good” and “lending a helping hand” or “giving a leg up” to people who want to make a career in your industry, you can afford to pay them something. And if you pay them something, you will have your pick of the ENTIRE potential candidate pool, not just the ones who can afford to do it for nothing and/or the ones willing to suffer through a summer because they are not self-aware enough to value their time and effort. If your company CANNOT afford to pay them something, then I would suggest that either you have no real need for them, or your company has real issues far larger than deciding which person to hire to do filing this summer.

If you respond to this with “well, that’s how I did it,” or “we’ve never done it that way in the past,” that’s not an actual reason to continue with the practice, and if you think it is, well, I don’t want to work for a person like you or a company like yours.

I would suggest all the would-be interns out there think about why, really, they want to work in an industry or for a company that values them at zero. What does that say about you and your career choice? Life’s too short to work for nothing. Find a company willing to do the right thing, like, say, the publisher of The Atlantic. I’d work for them (now). An organization that can change its mind and do the right thing (and retroactively, too) is the kind of company I would consider worthy of my time and effort.

Posted in General | 1 Response